One
may accept a teaching early in life; then reassess what they had formally
believed was absolute truth, after their understanding improves. Another
doesn’t put all that much importance into believing beyond what he has come to
be theologically comfortable with. After awhile, one can even know something
well enough that he endeavors to make it his life’s mission to convince us all
of the importance of it. He imagines that he has a superior insight and we’re
all lacking critical information until he explains it. If we are not careful we
might be tempted to sign on without even a modest background check. This
conviction imposing process, especially over nonessential Bible passages, has
given many a spurious educator the ability to condition a potential proselyte
until they too acquiesce to all the moving parts of any given opinion. A new
disciple may be slow to adjust or agree but after the consistency of many
words, the new initiate can be systematically worn down until he is conformed
to the image of his misguided mentor. In this case what a person believes will
merely be picked up second hand. Over time and with the constant recycling of
superstitious recreational eschatology, religious philosophy and historical
revisionism a person could, in theory, easily adapt to most popular views.
Unless the scripture is allowed to dominate a person thinking, pseudo
entertainment styled theology and popular opinion will by its very nature,
harden the unsuspecting seeker’s thinking into an impenetrable concrete buttress.
Am I getting through here?
まん防
2 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment